Skip to main content

The online world offers the promise of speech with minimal barriers and without borders. New technologies and widespread internet access have radically enhanced our ability to express ourselves; criticize those in power; gather and report the news; and make, adapt, and share creative works. Vulnerable communities have also found space to safely meet,  grow, and make themselves heard without being drowned out by the powerful. The ability to freely exchange ideas also benefits innovators, who can use all of their capabilities to build even better tools for their communities and the world.

In the U.S., the First Amendment grants individuals the right to speak without government interference. And globally, Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) protects the right to speak both online and offline. Everyone should be able to take advantage of this promise. And no government should have the power to decide who gets to speak and who doesn’t.

Government threats to online speakers are significant. Laws and policies have enabled censorship regimes, controlled access to information, increased government surveillance, and minimized user security and safety.

At the same time, online speakers’ reliance on private companies that facilitate their speech has grown considerably. Online services’ content moderation decisions have far-reaching impacts on speakers around the world. This includes social media platforms and online sites selectively enforcing their Terms of Service, Community Guidelines, and similar rules to censor dissenting voices and contentious ideas. That’s why these services must ground their moderation decisions in human rights and due process principles.

As the law and technology develops alongside our ever-evolving world, it’s important that these neither create nor reinforce obstacles to people’s ability to speak, organize, and advocate for change. Both the law and technology must enhance people’s ability to speak. That’s why EFF fights to protect free speech - because everyone has the right to share ideas and experiences safely, especially when we disagree.

Free Speech Highlights

Free Speech is Only as Strong as the Weakest Link

From Mubarak knocking a country offline by pressuring local ISPs to PayPal caving to political pressure to cut off funding to WikiLeaks, this year has brought us sobering examples of how online speech can be endangered. And it’s not only political speech that is threatened – in the United...

A person holding a megaphone that another person speaks through

Section 230

47 U.S.C. § 230The Internet allows people everywhere to connect, share ideas, and advocate for change without needing immense resources or technical expertise. Our unprecedented ability to communicate online—on blogs, social media platforms, and educational and cultural platforms like Wikipedia and the Internet Archive—is not an accident. Congress recognized that...

Free Speech Updates

A multi-colored bullhorn icon surrounded by grey-blue hexagons

Es hora de que los legisladores escuchen a los tribunales: Su ley de regulación el discurso en línea perjudicará los derechos de libertad de expresión de los internautas

A pesar de una larga historia de tribunales han dictaminado en que los esfuerzos del gobierno para regular la expresión en línea perjudican a todos los usuarios de Internet e interfieren con sus derechos de la Primera Enmienda, los legisladores estatales y federales siguen aprobando leyes que...

¡Victoria! El Tribunal Supremo dictamina que las plataformas tienen derecho, en virtud de la Primera Enmienda, a decidir qué discursos difundir, libres de mandatos estatales

El Tribunal Supremo dictaminó correctamente que las plataformas de medios sociales, al igual que los periódicos, las librerías y las galerías de arte antes que ellos, tienen derechos amparados por la Primera Enmienda a comisariar y editar el discurso de otros que ofrecen a sus usuarios.

Pages

Back to top

JavaScript license information